The Top Predictive Analytics Pitfalls to avoid

The Top Predictive Analytics Pitfalls to avoid

The Top Predictive Analytics Pitfalls to avoid
Predictive Analytics can yield amazing results.  The lift that can be achieved by basing future decisions from observed patterns in historical events can far outweigh anything that can be achieved by relying on gut-feel or being guided by anecdotal events.  There are numerous examples that demonstrate the possible lift that can be achieved across all possible industries, but a test we did recently in the retail sector showed that applying stable predictive models gave us a five-fold increase in the take-up of the product when compared against a random sample.  Let’s face it, there would not be so much focus on

Predictive Analytics and in particular Machine Learning if it was not yielding impressive results.

Read about the lessons we learned while using Machine Learning to predict the 2015 Rugby World Cup results
But predictive models are not bullet proof.  They can be a bit like race horses: somewhat sensitive to changes and with a propensity to leave the rider on the ground wondering what on earth just happened.

Read Also:
Why CMOs needs to be at the heart of digital transformation

The commoditising of Machine Learning is making data science a lot more accessible to the non data scientists of the world than ever before. With this in mind, my colleague and I sat and pondered, and we devised the following list of top predictive analytics pitfalls to avoid in order to keep your models performing as expected:
Making incorrect assumptions on the underlying training data.

Rushing in and making too many assumptions on the underlying training data can often lead to egg on the proverbial face. Take time to understand the data and trends in the distributions, missing values, outliers, etc.

Working with low volumes.
Low volumes is the data scientist’s unhappy place – they can lead to statistically weak, unstable and unreliable models.

The over-fitting chestnut.
In other words, creating a model that has many branches and therefore seems to provide better discrimination of the target variable, but falls over in the real world as it has introduced too much noise into the model.

Read Also:
Analytics helps the enterprise find its identity

Bias in the training data.
For example, you only offered a certain product to the Millennials. So, guess what? The Millennials are going to come through strongly in the model.

Including test data in the training data.
There have been a few epic fails where the test data has been included in the training data – giving the impression that the model is going to perform fantastically, but in reality results in a broken model. In the predictive analytics world, if the results are too good to be true, it is worth spending more time on your validations and even getting a second opinion to check over your work.

Not being creative with the provided data.
Predictive models can be significantly improved by creating some clever characteristics or features that can be used to better explain the trends in the data. Too often data scientists will work with what has been provided and will not spend enough time considering more creative features from the underlying data that can strengthen the models in ways that an improved algorithm cannot achieve.

Read Also:
Smart Data Plus Deep Reasoning Equals Business Value from Data Analysis

Expecting machines to understand business.
Machines cannot figure out (yet) what the business problem is and how best to tackle the problem. This is not always straight forward and can require some careful thought, involving wholesome discussions with the business stakeholders.

Using the wrong metric to measure the performance of a model.

Read Full Story…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *