Lessons Learned: What Big Data and Predictive Analytics Missed in 2016

Lessons Learned: What Big Data and Predictive Analytics Missed in 2016

Lessons Learned: What Big Data and Predictive Analytics Missed in 2016

In this era of the software-driven business, we’re told “data is the new oil”, and that predictive analytics and machine intelligence will extract actionable insights from this valuable resource and revolutionize the world as we know it. Yet, 2016 brought three highly visible failures in this predictive view of the world: the UK’s Brexit plebiscite; the Colombian referendum on FARC; and finally, the U.S. presidential election. What did these scenarios have in common? They all dealt with human behavior. This got me thinking that there might be lessons to be learned that are relevant to analytics.

The fact that data can be noisy or corrupted is well known. The question is: how does the uncertainty within the data propagate through the analytics and manifest itself in the accuracy of predictions derived from this data? For the purposes of this article, the analysis can be statistical, game-theoretic, deep learning-based, or anything else.

Read Also:
Top 5 misconceptions about Big Data

There is also an important distinction between what I call “hard” data and “soft” data. This is not standard terminology, so let me define what I mean by these terms.

Hard data comes from observations and measurements of the macroscopic natural world: the positions of astronomical objects, the electrical impulses within the brain, or even the amounts of your credit card transactions. Typically, such data is objective. The observations are numerical, and the uncertainty is adequately characterized as an error zone around a central value.  There is an (often unstated) assumption that the observation is trusted and repeatable (i.e., nature is not being adversarial and presenting the observer with misleading results).

Much effort has gone into designing measurement apparatus, calibration techniques, and experimental design to reduce the error zones. There is even the so-called “personal equation” to account for observer bias.

 



Data Science Congress 2017

5
Jun
2017
Data Science Congress 2017

20% off with code 7wdata_DSC2017

Read Also:
4 Ways Trillion Dollar Big Data will Affect Business
Read Also:
Could An AI Robot Run Your Company?

AI Paris

6
Jun
2017
AI Paris

20% off with code AIP17-7WDATA-20

Read Also:
DNA Data Storage Moves Beyond Moore's Law

Customer Analytics Innovation Summit Chicago

7
Jun
2017
Customer Analytics Innovation Summit Chicago

$200 off with code DATA200

Read Also:
How Your Business Can Benefit From Data Analytics

Chief Data Officer Summit San Francisco

7
Jun
2017
Chief Data Officer Summit San Francisco

$200 off with code DATA200

Read Also:
Hortonworks seeks salvation in proprietary software

Big Data and Analytics Marketing Summit London

12
Jun
2017
Big Data and Analytics Marketing Summit London

$200 off with code DATA200

Read Also:
Predictive Analysis Tools for Small to Midsize Businesses

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *