Data placement in the cloud and regulations for US financial services

Data placement in the cloud and regulations for US financial services

As momentum builds behind public cloud infrastructure solutions, even highly regulated industries like financial services are exploring their options. While regulations and security are often seen as stumbling blocks for public cloud acceptance in financial services, reviewing available information on U.S. regulatory guidance and privacy law suggests there may be ways to move into the cloud in compliance-friendly ways. This article, of course, should not replace input from appropriate legal advisors. The research behind this article focused on privacy law and requirements around U.S. banks rather than international issues that might arise from data placement in the cloud. 

The U.S. banking industry has several regulatory bodies, including the Federal Reserve Board, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, The National Credit Union Administration, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. A consortium group called the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council maintains a clearing house for guidance and regulatory information from the various regulators. On July 10, 2012, the Council issued a press release with guidance on public cloud utilization in banking. 

Read Also:
Fraugster, a startup that uses AI to detect payment fraud, raises $5M

The core of the guidance is public cloud risk management should follow the same risk management principles as any outsourcing contract.  “The Federal Financial Institution Examination Council Agencies consider cloud computing to be another form of outsourcing with the same basic risk characteristics and risk management requirements as traditional forms of outsourcing.”

The Council calls out some specific areas for attention by regulated entities.

The Council makes special reference to legal considerations, and it is worth a deeper exploration of what those are. The primary privacy regulations affecting U.S. financial services are contained in the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLB).  GLB originated as a response to concerns about banks sharing detailed account-holder information with third parties for marketing or cross-selling purposes. 

The act basically specifies handling requirements around data deemed personally identifiable and non-public. It bars sharing such data with third parties without explicit agreement from customers. GLB applies to a broad range of U.S. financial services including banks, mortgage originators and servicers, consumer credit agencies, et al.

Read Also:
Indian banks seek artificial intelligence

Because outsourcing infrastructure provisioning to a public cloud is, almost by definition, allowing 3rd party access to data, some specifics about GLB merit a closer look.

 



Sentiment Analysis Symposium

27
Jun
2017
Sentiment Analysis Symposium

15% off with code 7WDATA

Read Also:
Twelve Emerging Trends in Data Analytics (part 1 of 4)

Data Analytics and Behavioural Science Applied to Retail and Consumer Markets

28
Jun
2017
Data Analytics and Behavioural Science Applied to Retail and Consumer Markets

15% off with code 7WDATA

Read Also:
Are data lakes the answer to privacy regulations, competition in healthcare?

AI, Machine Learning and Sentiment Analysis Applied to Finance

28
Jun
2017
AI, Machine Learning and Sentiment Analysis Applied to Finance

15% off with code 7WDATA

Read Also:
What Data Analytics Can And Cannot Do

Real Business Intelligence

11
Jul
2017
Real Business Intelligence

25% off with code RBIYM01

Read Also:
The AI fight is escalating: This is the IT giants' next move

Advanced Analytics Forum

20
Sep
2017
Advanced Analytics Forum

15% off with code Discount15

Read Also:
What Data Analytics Can And Cannot Do
Read Also:
What Data Analytics Can And Cannot Do

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *