How Artificial Intelligence is set to disrupt our legal framework for Intellectual Property rights

How Artificial Intelligence is set to disrupt our legal framework for Intellectual Property rights

It’s safe to say that most sectors will undergo significant disruption as a result of artificial intelligence (AI) technology.  AI will not only disrupt our business models but it will also disrupt our legal framework for the creation and exploitation of intellectual property (IP) rights, giving rise to new IP challenges for those seeking to develop and deploy new AI systems.

With AI systems already being used to generate content capable of attracting IP protection, working out exactly who owns the IP rights in this content will become increasingly important, especially when it comes to licensing or enforcing those rights.

Ownership of copyright is determined with reference to the “author” of a work.  When an AI system is used by a human solely as a tool for creating a work, the same human using the system will generally be considered “the author”.  But what happens when the AI system is more involved in creating the work, e.g. it is given a few simple inputs and the system goes on to create something which is much more than the sum of the inputs?

In the UK for example, the legislation states that where a work “is generated by a computer in circumstances such that there is no human author of the work” the author will be “the person by whom the arrangements necessary for the creation of the work are undertaken”.  This provision doesn’t leave room for the AI itself to be considered the author.  Instead, it sets up a two-stage process to identify the author; first, look to see if there is a human author of the work and, if one can’t be found, look for the person “by whom the arrangements necessary for the creation of the work are undertaken”.  However, it is likely that disputes will arise at both stages when it comes to works which are generated by an AI system.  For example were the inputs sufficiently related to the outputs to classify the person who provided them as the author?  And who made the arrangements, was it the person who built the system, the person who trained it, or the person who fed it these specific inputs?

In order to apply for a patent, the application needs to identify one or more named inventors, with the common understanding that the inventor(s) are human beings.

Share it:
Share it:

[Social9_Share class=”s9-widget-wrapper”]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

You Might Be Interested In

How Can AI Reach its Full Potential?

22 Dec, 2022

AI vision, such as image processing with artificial intelligence, is a heavily debated subject. However, the promise of innovative, new …

Read more

New machine learning model describes dynamics of cell development

9 Apr, 2019

In order to address this problem, researchers at the Helmholtz Zentrum München and the University of Massachusetts use pseudodynamics, a …

Read more

What Constitutes a Perfect Data Team?

20 Sep, 2020

Data science is the most promising field in near future, with the advancement of technology and statistical models in recent …

Read more

Do You Want to Share Your Story?

Bring your insights on Data, Visualization, Innovation or Business Agility to our community. Let them learn from your experience.

Get the 3 STEPS

To Drive Analytics Adoption
And manage change

3-steps-to-drive-analytics-adoption

Get Access to Event Discounts

Switch your 7wData account from Subscriber to Event Discount Member by clicking the button below and get access to event discounts. Learn & Grow together with us in a more profitable way!

Get Access to Event Discounts

Create a 7wData account and get access to event discounts. Learn & Grow together with us in a more profitable way!

Don't miss Out!

Stay in touch and receive in depth articles, guides, news & commentary of all things data.