Chief data officer role shakes up traditional data governance

Chief data officer role shakes up traditional data governance

Chief data officer role shakes up traditional data governance

The arrival of Big Data means many things. For one, it has exposed the limits of data stalwarts such as structured query language (SQL) and relational databases. Sure, an organization's internal and structured data still matters – but it’s not the only game in town these days. Indeed, the vast majority of what we call big data is both unstructured and lies outside of enterprise walls. Grappling with issues around big data has persuaded many organizations to ink in a new box on the org chart – one for the chief data officer (CDO) role. 

Still think big data does not dramatically affect data governance and even basic management on many levels? Think again. Let’s take a closer look at what big data – specifically, the chief data officer role – means for traditional data governance.

By way of background, here’s a simple definition of a CDO. In my view, it represents an executive formally charged with how the enterprise uses and protects both internal and external information. To this end, the person in the chief data officer role is responsible for enterprisewide data governance. (As I'll explain later, the role may very well overlap with other executive positions.)

Read Also:
How Artificial Intelligence will Transform IT Operations and DevOps

Before continuing, a disclaimer is in order. Much like big data, there's anything but universal agreement on the definition and responsibilities of a proper CDO. Because it's such a nascent and evolving role, it's much murkier than a garden-variety CFO or CEO. What's more, many prominent organizations choose not to employ them. Examples include Amazon, Netflix, Facebook and Google.

Of course, it's folly to think of all organizations as the same. The business and data challenges facing a midsized American company differ dramatically from those faced by large health care organizations and behemoths like Google. Oh, and legislation differs greatly based on industry and geography. To expect all organizations to manage or govern their data identically or even similarly is just plain silly.

With respect to traditional data governance, my experience shows there are generally three types of organizations:

Let's assume for the sake of argument that Type A and B organizations are doing data governance well.

Read Also:
How Big Data helps banks know their customers better -

 



HR & Workforce Analytics Summit 2017 San Francisco

19
Jun
2017
HR & Workforce Analytics Summit 2017 San Francisco

$200 off with code DATA200

Read Also:
Imagine if Visa sold data about you to greedy hedge funds

M.I.E. SUMMIT BERLIN 2017

20
Jun
2017
M.I.E. SUMMIT BERLIN 2017

15% off with code 7databe

Read Also:
The war over artificial intelligence will be won with visual data

Sentiment Analysis Symposium

27
Jun
2017
Sentiment Analysis Symposium

15% off with code 7WDATA

Read Also:
An Open Source Data Analytics Library: Intel’s Impressive Entry

Data Analytics and Behavioural Science Applied to Retail and Consumer Markets

28
Jun
2017
Data Analytics and Behavioural Science Applied to Retail and Consumer Markets

15% off with code 7WDATA

Read Also:
An Open Source Data Analytics Library: Intel’s Impressive Entry

AI, Machine Learning and Sentiment Analysis Applied to Finance

28
Jun
2017
AI, Machine Learning and Sentiment Analysis Applied to Finance

15% off with code 7WDATA

Read Also:
Data Mining with Artificial Intelligence is Making Businesses Smarter

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *