A Code of Ethics for Smart Machines

A Code of Ethics for Smart Machines

A Code of Ethics for Smart Machines

Smart machines need ethics, too: Remember that movie in which a computer asked an impossibly young Matthew Broderick, “Shall we play a game?” Four decades later, it turns out that global thermonuclear war may be the least likely of a slew of ethical dilemmas associated with smart machines — dilemmas with which we are only just beginning to grapple.

The worrisome lack of a code of ethics for smart machines has not been lost on Alphabet, Amazon, Facebook, IBM, and Microsoft, according to a report by John Markoff in The New York Times. The five tech giants (if you buy Mark Zuckerberg’s contention that he isn’t running a media company) have formed an industry partnership to develop and adopt ethical standards for artificial intelligence — an effort that Markoff infers is motivated as much to head off government regulation as to safeguard the world from black-hearted machines.

On the other hand, the first of a century’s worth of quinquennial reports from Stanford’s One Hundred Year Study on Artificial Intelligence (AI100) throws the ethical ball into the government’s court. “American law represents a mixture of common law, federal, state, and local statutes and ordinances, and — perhaps of greatest relevance to AI — regulations,” its authors declare. “Depending on its instantiation, AI could implicate each of these sources of law.” But they don’t offer much concrete guidance to lawmakers or regulators — they say it’s too early in the game to do much more than noodle about where ethical (and legal) issues might emerge.

Read Also:
IBM, Quest Diagnostics Launch Watson for Genomics Service

In the meantime, if you’d like to get a taste for the kinds of ethical decisions that smart machines — like self-driving cars — are already facing, visit MIT’s Moral Machine project. Run through the scenarios and decide for yourself who or what the self-driving car should kill. Aside from the fun of deciding whether to run over two dogs and a pregnant lady or drive two old guys into the concrete barrier, it’ll help the research team create a crowd-sourced view of how humans might expect of ethical machines to act. This essay from UVA’s Bobby Parmar and Ed Freeman will also help fuel your thinking.

Shrugging off blockchain hacks: Speaking of ethics, can anyone tell me how to rip off $100 million or so in bitcoins? It seems like a surefire way to top off my retirement account. Heck, according to a new Reuters article by Gertrude Chavez-Dreyfuss, “a third of bitcoin trading platforms have been hacked, and nearly half have closed in the half dozen years since they burst on the scene.

Read Also:
Mixed reality will soon mean big business for brands

 



Chief Analytics Officer Europe

25
Apr
2017
Chief Analytics Officer Europe

15% off with code 7WDCAO17

Read Also:
What is the Best Data to Analyze for Beating the Competition?

Chief Analytics Officer Spring 2017

2
May
2017
Chief Analytics Officer Spring 2017

15% off with code MP15

Read Also:
IBM, Quest Diagnostics Launch Watson for Genomics Service

Big Data and Analytics for Healthcare Philadelphia

17
May
2017
Big Data and Analytics for Healthcare Philadelphia

$200 off with code DATA200

Read Also:
Inclusive cities are productive cities

SMX London

23
May
2017
SMX London

10% off with code 7WDATASMX

Read Also:
Don’t Forget the Basics in Digital Transformation

Data Science Congress 2017

5
Jun
2017
Data Science Congress 2017

20% off with code 7wdata_DSC2017

Read Also:
Mixed reality will soon mean big business for brands

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *